Difference between revisions of "The Reviews Are In"
DannyOBrien (talk | contribs) |
Gabemcelwain (talk | contribs) |
||
(9 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[Category:Danny O'Brien (cleveland)]] | [[Category:Danny O'Brien (cleveland)]] | ||
[[Category:Gabe McElwain (Chicago)]] | [[Category:Gabe McElwain (Chicago)]] | ||
+ | [[Category: gjmpoprock]] | ||
[[Media:Thereviewsarein2.mp3|The Reviews Are In - MP3]] | [[Media:Thereviewsarein2.mp3|The Reviews Are In - MP3]] | ||
Line 28: | Line 29: | ||
The characters were too contrived, the setup too complex | The characters were too contrived, the setup too complex | ||
− | We used up all the | + | We used up all the money on the violence and sex |
And had no story | And had no story | ||
Line 40: | Line 41: | ||
− | But in the end the thrills were | + | But in the end the thrills were fleeting; our public wanted more, |
Like a leading pair they’d be rooting for | Like a leading pair they’d be rooting for | ||
Line 55: | Line 56: | ||
The characters were too contrived, the setup too complex | The characters were too contrived, the setup too complex | ||
− | We used up all the | + | We used up all the money on the violence and sex |
And had no story | And had no story | ||
Line 67: | Line 68: | ||
In this town again | In this town again | ||
− | |||
− | |||
== Music == | == Music == | ||
Line 112: | Line 111: | ||
[[User:DannyOBrien|DannyOBrien]] 14:22, 19 March 2008 (PDT) | [[User:DannyOBrien|DannyOBrien]] 14:22, 19 March 2008 (PDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Nice job on the demo, Danny! I just made the slight tweaks to the lyrics that we talked about. Now I'll be able to sleep at night. Seems like despite our reservations, the ending we chose has gone over pretty well. I like it in practice as well as theory, too. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[User:Gabemcelwain|Gabemcelwain]] 08:24, 26 March 2008 (PDT) | ||
== Comments == | == Comments == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Fantastic! | ||
+ | #I love the old record effect on the rhythm track. | ||
+ | #The rhymes are all tight yet natural (I especially like "it'll...little," and of course the chorus). | ||
+ | #The ending is brilliant: it sounds like a whiney/sappy line about the relationship but then it turns into a Hollywood cliche, ending the song decisively in the movie rather than break up world (which I find hilarious). The slow-down and then sudden click right back into tempo with the return of the intro is also amazing. | ||
+ | #I like how the intro sounds spy movie-esque. | ||
+ | [[User:Dk|Dk]] 17:10, 23 March 2008 (PDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Brilliant! Deirdre and I burst out laughing when we listened to this song this morning. Here are my thoughts after about 10 listens. . . | ||
+ | #The rhythm is great. It reminds me of something you'd expect to hear on a washboard, or played with spoons. It fits the song perfectly. | ||
+ | #I like the way you are putting the emphasis on the wrong syllable. "something is clear" "The reviews are in" It's playful and completely out of character for Gabe. | ||
+ | #I like the way you don't get the relationship/movie concept until the end of the chorus. "the reviews are in" part builds tension, and then the 2nd part of the chorus delivers the punch line. deirdre and i laughed out loud when we got to this part of the song. | ||
+ | #The outro (bridge?) is great, and the perfect length. I'm a sucker for descending guitar lines. I love the guitar part that leads into the outro, and the chords are great there. Really great. | ||
+ | #Lastly, I like the way the rhythm slows down/breaks down at the end, but then comes back in time. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[User:Conorl|Conorl]] 17:21, 23 March 2008 (PDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Thanks for kind words, you two! DK, thanks for noticing rhymes, I had to sweat for some of them! Conor, it's funny that you mention mis-emphasising of a few of the syllables, because you're right--I try never to do that. But in the rare case when I think I might get away with it, I bolster myself by remembering "I Say", in which the emphases are all over the place. It bugged me like crazy at first when the Passerines first started playing it, but I came around to it eventually. Point is, in as much as I'm able to let myself do it, I owe that ability to DK. [[User:Gabemcelwain|Gabemcelwain]] 09:56, 24 March 2008 (PDT) |
Latest revision as of 18:04, 2 September 2009
Lyrics
We didn’t think it would be easy, we knew you only get
Out of something what you put into it
So we pooled our hearts and put our heads together
If I may say so you were brave beyond expectations long
After it was clear that something was wrong
This won’t come as a surprise but it’ll sting a little
The reviews are in
The reviews are in
Our love relied too heavily on special effects
The characters were too contrived, the setup too complex
We used up all the money on the violence and sex
And had no story
I would have nominated us for most optimistic pitch
Of a happy ending the likes of which
Would require disbelief beyond suspension
But in the end the thrills were fleeting; our public wanted more,
Like a leading pair they’d be rooting for
And although I’d give us points for trying, they’re not buying
The reviews are in
The reviews are in
Our love relied too heavily on special effects
The characters were too contrived, the setup too complex
We used up all the money on the violence and sex
And had no story
We’ll never work
We’ll never work
We’ll never work
In this town again
Music
Chords
intro:
G G+ e/G G+ G G+ c
verse:
e A C G e A7 a7 c e A C G e A7 a7 D
chorus:
G G+ e/G G+ G G+ e/G a0 a7 b7 C Dsus4 D a7/E Dsus4/F# G G+ e/G G+ G G+ c
bridge:
G b/F# e e7/D C D e A7/C# A7 C a0/D# B7 C c
Structure
A B A B C
Author's Notes
Gabe and I wrote this song together, via e-mail, in October and November of 2007. I wrote the chorus first, then Gabe wrote verse one. Then I wrote verse two, and Gabe revised a few lines. Then Gabe suggested the words for the bridge and I wrote the melody. Then we sat on the song for a while and agonized over a few word choices (inconclusively).
There is a lot wrong with this demo, but I think it at least captures the energy I'd want this song to have.
I don't think either of us knows exactly how to end it. Two choruses are enough.
DannyOBrien 14:22, 19 March 2008 (PDT)
Nice job on the demo, Danny! I just made the slight tweaks to the lyrics that we talked about. Now I'll be able to sleep at night. Seems like despite our reservations, the ending we chose has gone over pretty well. I like it in practice as well as theory, too.
Gabemcelwain 08:24, 26 March 2008 (PDT)
Comments
Fantastic!
- I love the old record effect on the rhythm track.
- The rhymes are all tight yet natural (I especially like "it'll...little," and of course the chorus).
- The ending is brilliant: it sounds like a whiney/sappy line about the relationship but then it turns into a Hollywood cliche, ending the song decisively in the movie rather than break up world (which I find hilarious). The slow-down and then sudden click right back into tempo with the return of the intro is also amazing.
- I like how the intro sounds spy movie-esque.
Dk 17:10, 23 March 2008 (PDT)
Brilliant! Deirdre and I burst out laughing when we listened to this song this morning. Here are my thoughts after about 10 listens. . .
- The rhythm is great. It reminds me of something you'd expect to hear on a washboard, or played with spoons. It fits the song perfectly.
- I like the way you are putting the emphasis on the wrong syllable. "something is clear" "The reviews are in" It's playful and completely out of character for Gabe.
- I like the way you don't get the relationship/movie concept until the end of the chorus. "the reviews are in" part builds tension, and then the 2nd part of the chorus delivers the punch line. deirdre and i laughed out loud when we got to this part of the song.
- The outro (bridge?) is great, and the perfect length. I'm a sucker for descending guitar lines. I love the guitar part that leads into the outro, and the chords are great there. Really great.
- Lastly, I like the way the rhythm slows down/breaks down at the end, but then comes back in time.
Conorl 17:21, 23 March 2008 (PDT)
Thanks for kind words, you two! DK, thanks for noticing rhymes, I had to sweat for some of them! Conor, it's funny that you mention mis-emphasising of a few of the syllables, because you're right--I try never to do that. But in the rare case when I think I might get away with it, I bolster myself by remembering "I Say", in which the emphases are all over the place. It bugged me like crazy at first when the Passerines first started playing it, but I came around to it eventually. Point is, in as much as I'm able to let myself do it, I owe that ability to DK. Gabemcelwain 09:56, 24 March 2008 (PDT)